Wikipedia:Archiv/Hülp vunn Wikimedia
Klaaf övver de ripoarisch Wikki op Wikimedia, ze finge op Meta. De Medmachernoom sinn zem jrüüßte Deijl nid jültisch heä op dä ripuarisch Wikipedija. Wann de wisse wellz wä dat eßß möötste op Meta nohluure.
Whats the trouble with the Kölsch Wikipedia?
I see that as of today, the Kölsch unofficial Wikipedia have over 1600 real articles, and is growing rapidly.
It seems that this Wikipedia is much more established than tens of Wikipedias that figure on the 200 + official list.
So WHY is the Kölsch Wikipedia still regarded as an unoficial and experimental wikipedia?
Togrim 2006-01-29 (user of the Nuwiggin Wikipedia)
- And today, over 1700 ... Togrim 2006-01-30
- Today, 1862 articles ... Togrim 2006-01-31
- Could you please give a link to those wikipedias? I'm really not sure what you are taling about. Blockinblox 20:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Not "THOSE" wikipedias, only ONE: Wikoelsch. Its on the meta page, Test Wikipedia no 10:
Test Wikipedias 1. Banyumasan - bdf - statistics - all articles 2. Bolgar (Болгар) - bol - statistics - all articles 3. Cantonese (粵語) - zh-yue 4. Chinuk Wawa - wawa 5. Dutch Low Saxon - nds-nl 6. Ladin (Dolomitan Ladin) - lld 7. Middle English (Middle Englisce) - enm 8. Murciano - mur 9. Novial - nov 10. Ripuarian languages (incl. Kölsch) - WiKoelsch - statistics - all articles
- More than 1900 articles, last time i checked ... Togrim, 2006-02-01
- Here's the links directly to the Kölsh stats page and WiKölsh front page with content about article counts as of today 2006-02-02: http://wikoelsch.dergruenepunk.de/index.php/Spezial:Statistics
Statistik aus WiKoelsch, der freien Wissensdatenbank
Seitenstatistik
Es gibt insgesamt 7141 Seiten in der Datenbank. Das schliesst "Diskussion"-Seiten, Seiten über WiKoelsch, extrem kurze Artikel, Weiterleitungen und andere Seiten ein, die nicht als Artikel gelten können. Diese ausgenommen, gibt es 1911 Seiten, die als Artikel gelten können.
Es wurden insgesamt 75109× Seiten aufgerufen, und 9783× Seiten bearbeitet. Daraus ergeben sich 1,37 Bearbeitungen pro Seite, und 7,68 Betrachtungen pro Bearbeitung.
http://wikoelsch.dergruenepunk.de/index.php/Houpsick
WiKoelsch — Wikkipedija op Ripoarisch
• Ööscher Platt • Bönnsch • Eschwiele Platt • Kirchröadsj • Kölsch • Nüüßer Platt • Sieshburjer Platt • Trooßdoorfer Platt • Vüürjeberschßplatt • WiKoelsch is en Testwikki för dä Möshlishkejte vun en ripoarische Wikkipdija ußzeloote. Jenaueres öwwer dä Hingerjründ iss em Arschiiv ze finge. Dä Aandraach op en Ripoarisch Wikkipedija ees jenemisch wudde un löß sich hee finge. Onß Strattejie för dat Jedöns klaa ze krijje könne mer heä zesammebaaßtele. Wi en Ripoarisch Wikkipedia heijße sull dum_mer hee beklaafe.
De Ripoarisch Testwikki hätt jez jrad janz jenau 1911 Atikkele övver Stėchwööt. Aanjefange ham_mer em Aujußß 2005. Im Interwikki-Verjleish eßß dat Plaatz 71 funn 212 Wikkipedijas, zweshe dä Shprooche Tamil (தமிழ்) op de eijn Sigg_unn Tshavash (Чăваш чěлхи) op de annder.
- As they state, IF they were on the meta list, they oughta be no 71 now. (My comment: Well, really at no 70, as it seems that Neapolitan hasnt really passed 1000 articles in actual content.)
- So I repeat my q: Whats wrong with Kölsh? Nothing wrong said about lingos with 2 or even 0 articles which are on the meta list. However, Kölsh, which has gone up like a rocket for the last coupla months, and will be passing 2000 articles one of these days, is NOT on the list.
- Can somebody in the know answer a stupid nuwiggin: WHY? Togrim 2006-02-02
- The people who frequent the Approved requests for new languages should be able to answer your questions as to why this particular Wikipedia hasn't been created yet. –Swid 16:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe my english is not clear enough or maybe there are some other communication problems? This Kölsch Wikipedia IS created. It has at present 1930 real articles, 45 users and several editors. My question is WHY IS IT NOT INCLUDED ON THE LIST OF WIKIPEDIAS? Why is it still classed as a "trial wikipedia"? Togrim 2006-02-04
- It's because the Kölsch Wikipedia is not (yet) hosted on a Wikimedia server. Once it's transferred to a wikipedia.org URL, the Kölsch Wikipedia will be added to this list. I do not know which Wikimedia users have the ability to create previously-approved Wikipedias and transfer information from the "test" Wikipedias, but if you would like help on finding these users, leave a message on my talk page and I will be glad to assist you. –Swid 22:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- That will be our hugely overworked and underappreciated developers. I would try talking to Brion as a first step. GeorgeStepanek 01:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- Clarification: The Kölch test-Wikipedia is not an officially hosted Test-wiki, unlike several of ther others listed on the approved languages list. However, none of the languages listed there (some of which have been waiting longer than Ripuarian) have seen any developer attention. Jade Knight 06:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- It's because the Kölsch Wikipedia is not (yet) hosted on a Wikimedia server. Once it's transferred to a wikipedia.org URL, the Kölsch Wikipedia will be added to this list. I do not know which Wikimedia users have the ability to create previously-approved Wikipedias and transfer information from the "test" Wikipedias, but if you would like help on finding these users, leave a message on my talk page and I will be glad to assist you. –Swid 22:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe my english is not clear enough or maybe there are some other communication problems? This Kölsch Wikipedia IS created. It has at present 1930 real articles, 45 users and several editors. My question is WHY IS IT NOT INCLUDED ON THE LIST OF WIKIPEDIAS? Why is it still classed as a "trial wikipedia"? Togrim 2006-02-04
- The people who frequent the Approved requests for new languages should be able to answer your questions as to why this particular Wikipedia hasn't been created yet. –Swid 16:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Nääx Arschief-Sigk:Andraach op Wikimedia, Arrschiiv Övverseech